Mobile · Native
Some products genuinely need native: deep camera control, background processing, widgets, watch apps, or the last word in performance. We build native iOS in Swift and Android in Kotlin when the product justifies it — and say so when it doesn't.
Cross-platform covers most MVPs; these are the exceptions where native earns its budget.
Two native apps are effectively two products: roughly double the build and maintenance of cross-platform. That's why we default to React Native or Flutter unless the product's core depends on native capability — and quote dual-native builds custom.
Often the answer is hybrid: a cross-platform app with one native module where it counts. You get native capability where the product needs it without doubling the codebase.
Cross-platform unless the core product depends on deep platform features. If your differentiator lives in the camera, sensors, or background processing — native, possibly just for that module.
Single-platform native MVPs start around €7,000; dual native (Swift + Kotlin) is quoted custom because it's two builds. Hybrid approaches often hit the budget sweet spot.
Whichever your ICP carries. EU consumer products often need both — which is itself an argument for cross-platform first.
Yes — that's a common engagement: the app stays cross-platform, the one capability that needs native gets it.
Yes — the 30-day post-launch window applies, and we can continue with feature sprints or hand off a documented codebase.
technologies
The technologies One Peak builds with — Next.js, React Native, Flutter, Supabase, and OpenAI — and how we scope and ship products on each.
case-studies
Products One Peak has scoped, designed, rebuilt, and shipped under real constraints.
comparisons
Compare the ways to build an MVP — freelancer vs product team, no-code builders vs custom code — and see which path fits your scope, risk, and timeline.
